Each user of the MySpace social network can designate a small subset of her friends as \emph{Top Friends,} placing them in a rank-ordered list displayed prominently on her profile. By examining users' \#1 (best) and \#2 (second-best) friends, we discover that MySpace users are nearly indifferent to these two friends' popularities when choosing which to designate as their best friend. Other pairs of ranks (e.g., \#1-vs.-\#3, \#2-vs.-\#3, \ldots) also reveal no marked preference for a popular friend over a less popular one. To the extent that ranking decisions form a window into broader decisions about whom to befriend at all, these observations suggest that positing individuals' tendency to attach to popular people---as in network-growth models like preferential attachment---may not suffice to explain the heavy-tailed degree distributions seen in real networks.