Enrollment in computer science has increased dramatically in recent
years, straining capacities and leading to various strategies for
managing enrollment. But some strategies increase student competition
and may have disproportionate negative impacts on students from
underrepresented groups. We believe success in computing education
necessitates a more equitable approach to course enrollment. In this
experience report, we describe our new enrollment mechanism, "the
Match." Building on the Gale--Shapley stable matching algorithm, the
Match was designed to encourage a liberal arts approach to course
selection and attempt to broaden participation in computing. Drawing
on data from three years of use, we find high student participation,
with the vast majority of students having their enrollment preferences
met. With Match registration, our courses have tended to be a bit more
inclusive of younger students. The Match appears not to have disparate
negative impacts like those of competitive enrollment, but has
increased workload in the Registrar's Office. Overall, we believe the
Match has decreased student and faculty angst around registration, and
we argue that systems like the Match can help manage enrollment
pressures in ways that are consistent with educational values.